From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Gastroenterology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for BE with Dysplasia

Radiofrequency ablation completely eradicated dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia in most patients and lowered risk for disease progression.

Although Barrett esophagus is typically a metaplasia of the epithelium, it can progress to low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and cancer. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as an alternative to radical esophagectomy in patients with HGD or early cancer. Now, researchers have assessed the ability of RFA to eradicate dysplastic BE and decrease the rate of neoplastic progression.

In this industry-sponsored, multicenter study, 127 patients with dysplastic BE were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either RFA or a sham procedure. Participants were stratified by the grade of their dysplasia; 64 had LGD and 63 had HGD. Those in the RFA group could receive up to four ablation sessions. BE was initially ablated with a circumferential RFA device; residual BE was treated with focal ablation. Biopsy samples were collected at 6 and 12 months in patients with LGD and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months in patients with HGD.

An intent-to-treat analysis showed that RFA completely eradicated dysplasia in 91% and 81% of patients with LGD and HGD, respectively, versus 23% and 19% in the sham group at 12-month follow-up (P<0.001 for both). The rate of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia was 77% for all RFA-treated patients versus 2% for the sham group. Patients who received RFA had a lower rate of disease progression than the sham group (4% vs. 16%; P=0.03) and fewer cancers (1% vs. 9%; P=0.045). At baseline, 25% of patients had subsquamous intestinal metaplasia (either LGD or HGD). At 12 months, subsquamous intestinal metaplasia was evident in 5% of the RFA group versus 40% of the sham group (P<0.001).

Comment: These data are consistent with recent study findings demonstrating the effectiveness of photodynamic ablative therapy for patients with HGD and mucosal adenocarcinoma (JW Gastroenterol Oct 10 2008). Less-radical strategies, such as ablation and endoscopic mucosal resection only of visible lesions, seem to offer patients excellent efficacy with negligible morbidity or mortality. However, the current study’s finding of decreased incidence of cancer in the RFA group should be viewed with caution. Malignancies were so rare in this cohort that a single incident cancer would have resulted in a loss of statistical significance.

Although a growing amount of data seems to support the use of endoscopic ablative therapy in BE with HGD, advocating the same therapy for LGD might be premature. The implications of these two diagnoses are markedly different, and more data on the natural history and appropriate management of LGD are needed. Furthermore, whether the excellent results achieved by these expert academic investigators can be extrapolated to procedures performed by less-experienced endoscopists in a community-practice setting remains to be seen.

David A. Johnson, MD

Dr. Brian Fennerty, a coauthor of this study, is Editor-in-Chief of Journal Watch Gastroenterology but had no input into the writing of this summary and comment.

Published in Journal Watch Gastroenterology May 27, 2009

Citation(s):

Shaheen NJ et al. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med 2009 May 28; 360:2277.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Related Content

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2009. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.