From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Gastroenterology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Meta-Analysis of Intensive Follow-Up After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer

Results of this meta-analysis suggest that intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer improves survival.

Surveillance regimens after curative resection for colorectal cancer in clinical practice vary widely. Further, guidelines are inconsistent and clinical trials have not provided definitive evidence that intensive follow-up improves survival. Researchers performed a meta-analysis of data from 5 randomized controlled trials (1342 participants) in which intensive and control follow-up regimens were compared after curative resection for colorectal cancer. Intensive surveillance protocols involved varied use of colonoscopy, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing, liver imaging, and chest X-ray.

The risk ratio for all-cause mortality in the intensive-surveillance group was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70-0.94). The effect on mortality was most pronounced in the 4 trials in which computed tomography and frequent serum CEA measurements were used (RR, 0.73; CI, 0.60-0.89). Intensive follow-up was associated with earlier detection of recurrence (mean, 8.5 months earlier) and increased detection rate of isolated local recurrence (RR, 1.61; CI, 1.12-2.32). Overall rates of intraluminal recurrence and detection of metachronous cancer were low (3.2% and 1.3%, respectively), and there were no differences between follow-up regimens.

Comment: The results of this meta-analysis challenge the results of single smaller studies and of previous meta-analyses that included retrospective studies. The data suggest that intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer improves survival and that intensive surveillance should be focused on detection of extramural recurrence by CEA and computed tomography and not on detection of intraluminal recurrence by colonoscopy. The cost of intensive surveillance per life-year saved was not calculated.

— Douglas K. Rex, MD

Published in Journal Watch Gastroenterology July 2, 2002

Citation(s):

Renehan AG et al. Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2002 Apr 6; 324:813-6.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2002. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.