From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Gastroenterology>
  4. Summary and Comment

Using Aspirin to Prevent Colon Cancer: A Cost Analysis

Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with 30 percent to 50 percent reductions in risk for colorectal cancer mortality. Researchers in this study used a decision analytic model to explore the incremental clinical and economic effects of adding aspirin therapy to screening for sporadic colorectal cancer in adults aged 50 to 80. The screening strategies examined were flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years plus annual fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) or colonoscopy every 10 years.

The rate and cost of complications related to aspirin therapy determined its cost-effectiveness. Assuming a 30 percent reduction in colorectal cancer risk with aspirin use, adding aspirin therapy to screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy and FOBT increased cost and decreased life-years because of aspirin-related complications. Adding aspirin therapy to colonoscopy was not cost-effective ($149,161 per life-year gained). However, in patients who were taking aspirin already, screening with either strategy was cost-effective ( < $31,000 per life-year gained). Aspirin chemoprevention was not cost-effective in patients who adhered to screening for a range of estimated aspirin-related colorectal cancer risk reduction rates (from 5 percent to 55 percent), aspirin-related complication rates, and screening adherence rates. The authors concluded that decisions about aspirin use should be based on cardiovascular risk, not colorectal cancer prevention.

Comment: These results suggest that routine aspirin use is not warranted to prevent colorectal cancer because screening is sufficiently cost-effective, aspirin is relatively ineffective, and risks for and costs of aspirin-related complications may outweigh the benefits. COX-2 inhibitors are unlikely to fare as well as aspirin in similar models, given their higher cost. These analyses, however, do not exclude the possibility that it still may be appropriate to prescribe aspirin or other NSAIDs for colorectal cancer chemoprevention in patients at very high risk for colorectal cancer, particularly if they do not adhere to screening protocols.

— DK Rex

Published in Journal Watch Gastroenterology November 27, 2001

Citation(s):

Ladabaum U et al. Aspirin as an adjunct to screening for prevention of sporadic colorectal cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 2001 Nov 6 135 769-781.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2001. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.